You are viewing documentation for Kubernetes version: v1.29
Kubernetes v1.29 documentation is no longer actively maintained. The version you are currently viewing is a static snapshot. For up-to-date information, see the latest version.
Resource Bin Packing
In the scheduling-plugin NodeResourcesFit
of kube-scheduler, there are two
scoring strategies that support the bin packing of resources: MostAllocated
and RequestedToCapacityRatio
.
Enabling bin packing using MostAllocated strategy
The MostAllocated
strategy scores the nodes based on the utilization of resources, favoring the ones with higher allocation.
For each resource type, you can set a weight to modify its influence in the node score.
To set the MostAllocated
strategy for the NodeResourcesFit
plugin, use a
scheduler configuration similar to the following:
apiVersion: kubescheduler.config.k8s.io/v1
kind: KubeSchedulerConfiguration
profiles:
- pluginConfig:
- args:
scoringStrategy:
resources:
- name: cpu
weight: 1
- name: memory
weight: 1
- name: intel.com/foo
weight: 3
- name: intel.com/bar
weight: 3
type: MostAllocated
name: NodeResourcesFit
To learn more about other parameters and their default configuration, see the API documentation for
NodeResourcesFitArgs
.
Enabling bin packing using RequestedToCapacityRatio
The RequestedToCapacityRatio
strategy allows the users to specify the resources along with weights for
each resource to score nodes based on the request to capacity ratio. This
allows users to bin pack extended resources by using appropriate parameters
to improve the utilization of scarce resources in large clusters. It favors nodes according to a
configured function of the allocated resources. The behavior of the RequestedToCapacityRatio
in
the NodeResourcesFit
score function can be controlled by the
scoringStrategy field.
Within the scoringStrategy
field, you can configure two parameters: requestedToCapacityRatio
and
resources
. The shape
in the requestedToCapacityRatio
parameter allows the user to tune the function as least requested or most
requested based on utilization
and score
values. The resources
parameter
comprises both the name
of the resource to be considered during scoring and
its corresponding weight
, which specifies the weight of each resource.
Below is an example configuration that sets
the bin packing behavior for extended resources intel.com/foo
and intel.com/bar
using the requestedToCapacityRatio
field.
apiVersion: kubescheduler.config.k8s.io/v1
kind: KubeSchedulerConfiguration
profiles:
- pluginConfig:
- args:
scoringStrategy:
resources:
- name: intel.com/foo
weight: 3
- name: intel.com/bar
weight: 3
requestedToCapacityRatio:
shape:
- utilization: 0
score: 0
- utilization: 100
score: 10
type: RequestedToCapacityRatio
name: NodeResourcesFit
Referencing the KubeSchedulerConfiguration
file with the kube-scheduler
flag --config=/path/to/config/file
will pass the configuration to the
scheduler.
To learn more about other parameters and their default configuration, see the API documentation for
NodeResourcesFitArgs
.
Tuning the score function
shape
is used to specify the behavior of the RequestedToCapacityRatio
function.
shape:
- utilization: 0
score: 0
- utilization: 100
score: 10
The above arguments give the node a score
of 0 if utilization
is 0% and 10 for
utilization
100%, thus enabling bin packing behavior. To enable least
requested the score value must be reversed as follows.
shape:
- utilization: 0
score: 10
- utilization: 100
score: 0
resources
is an optional parameter which defaults to:
resources:
- name: cpu
weight: 1
- name: memory
weight: 1
It can be used to add extended resources as follows:
resources:
- name: intel.com/foo
weight: 5
- name: cpu
weight: 3
- name: memory
weight: 1
The weight
parameter is optional and is set to 1 if not specified. Also, the
weight
cannot be set to a negative value.
Node scoring for capacity allocation
This section is intended for those who want to understand the internal details of this feature. Below is an example of how the node score is calculated for a given set of values.
Requested resources:
intel.com/foo : 2
memory: 256MB
cpu: 2
Resource weights:
intel.com/foo : 5
memory: 1
cpu: 3
FunctionShapePoint {{0, 0}, {100, 10}}
Node 1 spec:
Available:
intel.com/foo: 4
memory: 1 GB
cpu: 8
Used:
intel.com/foo: 1
memory: 256MB
cpu: 1
Node score:
intel.com/foo = resourceScoringFunction((2+1),4)
= (100 - ((4-3)*100/4)
= (100 - 25)
= 75 # requested + used = 75% * available
= rawScoringFunction(75)
= 7 # floor(75/10)
memory = resourceScoringFunction((256+256),1024)
= (100 -((1024-512)*100/1024))
= 50 # requested + used = 50% * available
= rawScoringFunction(50)
= 5 # floor(50/10)
cpu = resourceScoringFunction((2+1),8)
= (100 -((8-3)*100/8))
= 37.5 # requested + used = 37.5% * available
= rawScoringFunction(37.5)
= 3 # floor(37.5/10)
NodeScore = ((7 * 5) + (5 * 1) + (3 * 3)) / (5 + 1 + 3)
= 5
Node 2 spec:
Available:
intel.com/foo: 8
memory: 1GB
cpu: 8
Used:
intel.com/foo: 2
memory: 512MB
cpu: 6
Node score:
intel.com/foo = resourceScoringFunction((2+2),8)
= (100 - ((8-4)*100/8)
= (100 - 50)
= 50
= rawScoringFunction(50)
= 5
memory = resourceScoringFunction((256+512),1024)
= (100 -((1024-768)*100/1024))
= 75
= rawScoringFunction(75)
= 7
cpu = resourceScoringFunction((2+6),8)
= (100 -((8-8)*100/8))
= 100
= rawScoringFunction(100)
= 10
NodeScore = ((5 * 5) + (7 * 1) + (10 * 3)) / (5 + 1 + 3)
= 7
What's next
- Read more about the scheduling framework
- Read more about scheduler configuration